Some plays age. Others grow sharper with time. Nearly four decades after its debut, Ensemble Theatre’s revival of David Williamson’s Top Silk demonstrates that this social and political satire has retained its edge. The technology may have changed, but the relentless pursuit of power, ambition, and influence remains remarkably familiar.

Set against the shifting political, legal and domestic landscape of the late 1980s, Top Silk follows idealistic solicitor Jane Fredericks. When an old flame desperately needs her legal assistance after becoming caught in the machinery of Australia’s hardline drug laws, Jane’s determination to defend him collides head-on with her husband Trevor’s burgeoning political ambitions. This places love, loyalty and professional ethics on a destructive course.

Williamson’s genius lies in collapsing the distance between the public and the private. Courtroom battles spill into living rooms, where every political calculation and moral compromise carries a deeply personal cost. As a master of hyper-colloquial realism, Williamson deploys rapid, biting dialogue that allows human contradiction and hubris to drive the themes.

Director Mark Kilmurry resists a nostalgic retreat into ’80s kitsch. While Madeleine Picard’s brooding, synth-infused score and Ailsa Paterson’s sleek, multi-level set anchor the staging in its era and institutional hierarchies. These elements function as a sharp frame rather than a retro gimmick. Kilmurry highlights an enduring reality: while the world has modernised, the structures that preserve power have barely shifted.

Rachel Gordon anchors the drama by portraying Jane not as a moral crusader, but as a pragmatist negotiating a slippery slope of ethical erosion and relentless pressure. Jane risks sliding into self-righteousness, but Gordon makes her compellingly flawed, infusing the character with compassion, intelligence, and clear-eyed grit. Gordon charts her slow transformation with remarkable authenticity, balancing formidable professional resolve with deeply felt moments of vulnerability.

Beyond the courtroom, Jane is left to navigate the fractured relationship between her husband and son. As Trevor, Nicholas Brown embodies the quintessential product of 1980s corporate law masculinity- a man who has learned to value achievement and image over empathy and intimacy. Brown captures Trevor’s controlled detachment and intellectual arrogance without making him irredeemably unlikable.He allows glimpses of inner conflict to surface, revealing a deeply stunted man who mistakes success for fulfilment, control for strength, and authority for love.

Diverging sharply from paternal expectations, Samir Nasser beautifully captures Mark’s remarkable sensitivity and emotional intelligence. Caught between his father’s relentless ambition and his mother’s awakening conscience, he becomes the moral centre, exposing the widening gulf between the lives people project and the lives they actually lead. As Mark refuses to accept his father’s values, Jane can no longer ignore the compromises that have shaped her own life. She is forced to confront the realisation that in marrying Trevor, she simply traded the patriarchal expectations of her upbringing for a different kind of trap.

Top Silk’s power structures are anchored by a superb supporting cast who collectively expose the disturbing ease of institutional privilege. Jamie Oxenbould’s slick political fixer projects the unbothered authority of a man insulated by backroom influence. Beside him, Thomas Campbell and Laurence Coy double their roles to great effect: Campbell shifts from the nonchalant opportunism of media mogul Paul Bradley to the gravitas of the presiding judge, while Coy effortlessly steps between oily political insider Stuart Kelvin and the courtroom prosecutor. This clever doubling acts as a potent argument – media, politics, and the judiciary are merely different masks worn by the exact same self-serving establishment.

The sharpest irony belongs to Jeremy Waters as Eddie O’Donnell as Jane’s school friend and first love. Waters brings a larrikin charm and unaffected honesty that cuts directly through the posturing of the “respectable” men around him. In a legal system engineered for political ambition rather than justice, Eddie represents the human cost: the man who broke the law ultimately possesses more humanity than the establishment figures who judge him, shape public opinion and determine his fate.

One of this play’s greatest pleasures is the way Williamson allows every side of the political, legal and moral debate to make its case. There is enormous satisfaction in watching the arguments collide as our own sympathies and intellectual rigour continually shift. However, the final scenes resolve those tensions a little too neatly, undermining the preceding forensic discourse. Williamson pulls back from the edge of systemic rot toward optimism and fortuitous resolution, just as the dry, inherent cynicism is poised to deliver its most devastating blow.

Ultimately, Top Silk demonstrates that institutional decay remains perennially, chillingly in fashion. Kilmurry structures this scathing satire as a series of calculated gambits where characters trap themselves and every laugh carries a sting. When the humour has evaporated, it leaves an unsettling truth: the greatest danger lies not in individual corruption, but in the systems that feed on compromise.

Top Silk plays at Ensemble Theatre until 12 September 2026.

For tickets and more information, visit: https://www.ensemble.com.au/shows/top-silk/

Before the gavel falls, rest your case by following Faith in Theatres on Facebook, Instagram and TikTok. The evidence? The latest theatre news, reviews, interviews and stories from stages across Sydney and beyond.
Because theatre – needs Faith.